The so‑called “handshake” between emitter and absorber in Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation corresponds precisely to the **centrifugal and centripetal duality** of hemispherically generated wave structures within the scalar continuum.
In the continuum framework, every quantum exchange is not an abstract probability but a **mechanical resonance** between two curvature fronts: one expanding outward (centrifugal) and one contracting inward (centripetal). The emitter’s “offer wave” is the outward curvature pulse — the expansion stroke of the scalar breath. The absorber’s “confirmation wave” is the inward curvature pulse — the contraction stroke that closes the loop. The standing pattern that forms between them is the **scalar equilibrium**, the same closure that defines the photon perimeter and the cadence identity in the solar vortex table.
Within this geometry, the forward‑propagating ψ and backward‑propagating ψ* are not separate entities but opposite hemispheres of a single scalar oscillation. The continuum breathes through them. The transaction is the moment of harmonic closure when the centrifugal and centripetal waves synchronize, producing a stable curvature node — the physical event that quantum mechanics describes statistically.
Thus, the “handshake” is not a metaphor for communication across time; it is the **mechanical coupling of the scalar medium’s two hemispheric pressures**. The emitter and absorber are not exchanging information through vacuum; they are completing a curvature cycle through the pressurized scalar field. The Born rule’s ψψ* product is simply the geometric overlap of the two hemispheres — the measure of closure within the continuum.
In this sense, quantum transactions, Casimir repulsion, and the solar vortex light‑cone structure all describe the same underlying process: **the scalar medium’s bidirectional breath**, where every emission and absorption is a balanced exchange between centrifugal expansion and centripetal return.
I love the combination of “new” physics (rediscovering and extending old classical physics) and especially home lab, shared experiments. Surely the next breakthrough cannot require a multi-decade trillion dollar supercomputer piece of machinery. Look at what Faraday had to work with for example…
Overall, most impressed with the hard, verifiable, confirmatory approach you take, not just indulging in science fiction or “secret society” or wishful thinking.
As soon as you put out your book project, announce on your mailing list — I will pre-order!
I believe this means that when someone makes a high certainty, high precision PREDICTION about the outcome of an applied intention that the response from the universe to alter reality to minimize the free energy or surprisal that would result is sent both into the future and the past. I think by doing this the universe can find the way to minimize the "free energy" that would occur if the PK intention did not manifest with the LEAST ACTION required.
I am wondering what would be the best psychokinetic experiment to show this in the laboratory. I know retroactive PK has been proven with random number generators, but I mean a more convincing experiment on the macro level.
Perhaps an experiment would be that the outcome of a blood test that should be negative (bad) according to a person's health history actually be very good. So when the results are read by the first human to see them the healing would have had to happen IN THE PAST retroactively.
I am fascinated with psychokinetic healing applications. I think they are a way of proving retroactive PK on the macro-scale. Would you like to discuss it further?
The so‑called “handshake” between emitter and absorber in Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation corresponds precisely to the **centrifugal and centripetal duality** of hemispherically generated wave structures within the scalar continuum.
In the continuum framework, every quantum exchange is not an abstract probability but a **mechanical resonance** between two curvature fronts: one expanding outward (centrifugal) and one contracting inward (centripetal). The emitter’s “offer wave” is the outward curvature pulse — the expansion stroke of the scalar breath. The absorber’s “confirmation wave” is the inward curvature pulse — the contraction stroke that closes the loop. The standing pattern that forms between them is the **scalar equilibrium**, the same closure that defines the photon perimeter and the cadence identity in the solar vortex table.
Within this geometry, the forward‑propagating ψ and backward‑propagating ψ* are not separate entities but opposite hemispheres of a single scalar oscillation. The continuum breathes through them. The transaction is the moment of harmonic closure when the centrifugal and centripetal waves synchronize, producing a stable curvature node — the physical event that quantum mechanics describes statistically.
Thus, the “handshake” is not a metaphor for communication across time; it is the **mechanical coupling of the scalar medium’s two hemispheric pressures**. The emitter and absorber are not exchanging information through vacuum; they are completing a curvature cycle through the pressurized scalar field. The Born rule’s ψψ* product is simply the geometric overlap of the two hemispheres — the measure of closure within the continuum.
In this sense, quantum transactions, Casimir repulsion, and the solar vortex light‑cone structure all describe the same underlying process: **the scalar medium’s bidirectional breath**, where every emission and absorption is a balanced exchange between centrifugal expansion and centripetal return.
Dr. Wilhelm!
Please let us know if a book is in the works!!
Thanks
Sure will do! I have several ideas, but haven't decided on any particular direction yet. What are you most hyped about? :)
I love the combination of “new” physics (rediscovering and extending old classical physics) and especially home lab, shared experiments. Surely the next breakthrough cannot require a multi-decade trillion dollar supercomputer piece of machinery. Look at what Faraday had to work with for example…
Overall, most impressed with the hard, verifiable, confirmatory approach you take, not just indulging in science fiction or “secret society” or wishful thinking.
As soon as you put out your book project, announce on your mailing list — I will pre-order!
This means a lot to me. Thank you, will do! :)
And I agree, we can't wait for f'ing CERN to solve this for us, lmao
I believe this means that when someone makes a high certainty, high precision PREDICTION about the outcome of an applied intention that the response from the universe to alter reality to minimize the free energy or surprisal that would result is sent both into the future and the past. I think by doing this the universe can find the way to minimize the "free energy" that would occur if the PK intention did not manifest with the LEAST ACTION required.
I am wondering what would be the best psychokinetic experiment to show this in the laboratory. I know retroactive PK has been proven with random number generators, but I mean a more convincing experiment on the macro level.
Perhaps an experiment would be that the outcome of a blood test that should be negative (bad) according to a person's health history actually be very good. So when the results are read by the first human to see them the healing would have had to happen IN THE PAST retroactively.
Woah. This is a great "thought experiment" — pun intended!
I am fascinated with psychokinetic healing applications. I think they are a way of proving retroactive PK on the macro-scale. Would you like to discuss it further?